When relating a tragedy, story-tellers seem to employ a time-tested strategy: unravel the events as experienced by one of the victims. Think, for example, of Titanic, where the fate of the ocean liner hit the rocks along with the fate of the two young lovers aboard the ship. Or, consider Pearl Harbor, where once more a tale of love and loss escorted the attack on the American port into our consciousness. Moving away from cinema, the viewpoint of one or a few of many victims is also the spine of documentaries that detail natural and man-made disasters. Could it be that we are better at extrapolating the misfortune of one of the victims – chosen by the auteur and intimately introduced to us over the course of the narrative – to sympathize with the tragedy of the many, than at gauging the impact on each individual when presented with the account of the trials of an impersonal mass of people? What made me wonder about this style of narration being a strategy is a Kannada movie I ...